You posted a job. We fill it with a person who comes with AI.

I hired for this job for a decade. We were paying people to be software.

I co-founded an e-commerce company and grew it to $120M in revenue and 150 people. Every time finance fell behind, the answer was the same: post the job, wait three months, hire one more person at one rate for every hour. Then I watched good people spend their days matching bank lines and retyping bills, work with a right answer, while the close slipped and my questions waited.

So we went and read the postings. 107,442 US finance jobs from March 22 to October 3, 2026, and nearly all of them ask for what I used to ask for: one person, one rate, every hour of the week. We read 150 bookkeeper postings by hand. 84 asked for someone in the building. Only 10 had a task that needed it.

The posting is the problem, not the people. Nobody went into accounting to retype bills. So we fill the job you posted with a named person who comes with software agents. The agents take the work that has a right answer. Your person checks every result, closes the month, makes the calls and answers your questions. You stop paying a person's rate for a machine's work, and they finally get to do the job they trained for.

If any of that rules us out, I would rather you knew now than after the first close.